Stop using non-standard UID_MAX and GID_MAX because a variety of code
uses inclusive comparisons such that the UINT_MAX value aliases on top
of -1 and causes issues. First instance of this reported by Acts1631.
joint work with millert
Stop using non-standard UID_MAX and GID_MAX because a variety of code
uses inclusive comparisons such that the UINT_MAX value aliases on top
of -1 and causes issues. First instance of this reported by Acts1631.
joint work with millert
Stop using non-standard UID_MAX and GID_MAX because a variety of code
uses inclusive comparisons such that the UINT_MAX value aliases on top
of -1 and causes issues. First instance of this reported by Acts1631.
joint work with millert
update to resiprocate-1.14.0, unbreaks build with newer asio
I had to disable building tests due to some errors around sdp and
auto_ptr. Didn't investigate further as wanted to unbreak it quickly.
sysutils/pftop: handle removal of UID_MAX und GID_MAX
The UID_MAX and GID_MAX macros are not portable, their use is prone
to errors, and they will be removed from the OpenBSD headers shortly.
Mirror a corresponding change to pfctl(8).
*/*: handle removal of UID_MAX und GID_MAX
The UID_MAX and GID_MAX macros are not portable, their use is prone
to errors, and they will be removed from the OpenBSD headers shortly.
Correct related mistakes in range handling: UINT_MAX is not a valid
user or group ID.
Do not write multiple assignment of the same value to multiple cmmu registers
as nested assignment in a single statement.
This used to work in the gcc 2 days, but from gcc 3 onwards, because these
registers are declared volatile, this caused register reloads to propagate
the assignment value.
This had been noticed and fixed in arch/luna88k/luna88k/machdep.c 1.135, but
the similar constructs in this file were missed.
Noticed by tsutsuii at netbsd